Comments on: Open Source MIDI Controller Under CC http://virtualturntable.fourstones.net/open-source-midi-controller-under-cc Tips, tricks, technology reviews, previews and musings on the current state of affairs in music and audio software for personal computers. Thu, 17 May 2012 14:54:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2 Comment on Open Source MIDI Controller Under CC by: Mudo http://virtualturntable.fourstones.net/open-source-midi-controller-under-cc#comment-30666 Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:04:43 +0000 http://virtualturntable.fourstones.net/open-source-midi-controller-under-cc#comment-30666 ... http://www.mspinky.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=864 Midi scratching for real and scalable. ... …
http://www.mspinky.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=864

Midi scratching for real and scalable.

…

]]> Comment on Open Source MIDI Controller Under CC by: PJ Cabrera http://virtualturntable.fourstones.net/open-source-midi-controller-under-cc#comment-21005 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:51:39 +0000 http://virtualturntable.fourstones.net/open-source-midi-controller-under-cc#comment-21005 The type of license is currently specified at auroramixer.com/files.html It could perhaps say it more clearly, and I don't know whether it was added after this blog entry was posted. But it now says "unless noted all content and files on this page are licensed under a creative commons license" and it links to CC attribution-share-alike license 3.0. The type of license is currently specified at auroramixer.com/files.html

It could perhaps say it more clearly, and I don’t know whether it was added after this blog entry was posted.

But it now says “unless noted all content and files on this page are licensed under a creative commons license” and it links to CC attribution-share-alike license 3.0.

]]> Comment on Open Source MIDI Controller Under CC by: Peter Kirn http://virtualturntable.fourstones.net/open-source-midi-controller-under-cc#comment-20500 Thu, 10 Jul 2008 03:36:52 +0000 http://virtualturntable.fourstones.net/open-source-midi-controller-under-cc#comment-20500 Sorry, those were meant to be separate thoughts. The GPL is more explicit about the protection of certain rights and -- *because* the CC is a family of licenses -- narrower in scope. I meant to imply simply that CC seems to be appealing to people in the music community, presumably because they are familiar with the ability of CC to cover things like music much more effectively. I'm equally confused as to why the CC license isn't specified anywhere on their docs (I thought maybe I was missing it, but it's not on the specs, either) -- or which license they're using. I'll ask them tomorrow as I expect we'll get a pricing update then, as well. I got ... rushed. Apologies. Sorry, those were meant to be separate thoughts. The GPL is more explicit about the protection of certain rights and — *because* the CC is a family of licenses — narrower in scope. I meant to imply simply that CC seems to be appealing to people in the music community, presumably because they are familiar with the ability of CC to cover things like music much more effectively.

I’m equally confused as to why the CC license isn’t specified anywhere on their docs (I thought maybe I was missing it, but it’s not on the specs, either) — or which license they’re using. I’ll ask them tomorrow as I expect we’ll get a pricing update then, as well. I got … rushed. Apologies.

]]>