<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Controls Music?</title>
	<link>http://virtualturntable.fourstones.net/who-controls-music</link>
	<description>Tips, tricks, technology reviews, previews and musings on the current state of affairs in music and audio software for personal computers.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 15:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Who Controls Music? by: gurdonark</title>
		<link>http://virtualturntable.fourstones.net/who-controls-music#comment-47630</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://virtualturntable.fourstones.net/who-controls-music#comment-47630</guid>
					<description>I agree that an orthodoxy which insisted that everything must be CC 0 would be as unpalatable as an orthodoxy which insists that only huge corporation should control the store shelves and the airwaves.

The key to CC is not that it is an ideological solution to all issues and woes. It's instead a set of tools, for every individual to work out her or his solution with the appropriate fear and trembling.

That's why I never worry about the folks who decry CC--if you can't see the advantages in a simplified set of copyright licenses for hobbyists, educators, and, yes, even performers, working in internet media, then your imagination
is limited.

But it's a matter of context and nuance--and not a simple CC is some wild blue heaven situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I agree that an orthodoxy which insisted that everything must be CC 0 would be as unpalatable as an orthodoxy which insists that only huge corporation should control the store shelves and the airwaves.</p>
	<p>The key to CC is not that it is an ideological solution to all issues and woes. It&#8217;s instead a set of tools, for every individual to work out her or his solution with the appropriate fear and trembling.</p>
	<p>That&#8217;s why I never worry about the folks who decry CC&#8211;if you can&#8217;t see the advantages in a simplified set of copyright licenses for hobbyists, educators, and, yes, even performers, working in internet media, then your imagination<br />
is limited.</p>
	<p>But it&#8217;s a matter of context and nuance&#8211;and not a simple CC is some wild blue heaven situation.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Who Controls Music? by: Lucas Gonze</title>
		<link>http://virtualturntable.fourstones.net/who-controls-music#comment-45849</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://virtualturntable.fourstones.net/who-controls-music#comment-45849</guid>
					<description>&quot;Charge the confusion to my expense account&quot; -- can I quote you on that?  

On teru's point, I personally don't feel comfortable recommending CC 0 to any other musician.  It's so extreme that it even makes me uncomfortable about recordings I make that hardly get 20 listens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;Charge the confusion to my expense account&#8221; &#8212; can I quote you on that?  </p>
	<p>On teru&#8217;s point, I personally don&#8217;t feel comfortable recommending CC 0 to any other musician.  It&#8217;s so extreme that it even makes me uncomfortable about recordings I make that hardly get 20 listens.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

